# coding: utf-8
"""
LUSID API
FINBOURNE Technology # noqa: E501
Contact: info@finbourne.com
Generated by OpenAPI Generator (https://openapi-generator.tech)
Do not edit the class manually.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import pprint
import re # noqa: F401
import json
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Any, Union, TYPE_CHECKING
from typing_extensions import Annotated
from pydantic.v1 import BaseModel, StrictStr, StrictInt, StrictBool, StrictFloat, StrictBytes, Field, validator, ValidationError, conlist, constr
from datetime import datetime
from lusid.models.aggregate_spec import AggregateSpec
from lusid.models.reconciliation_rule import ReconciliationRule
[docs]
class ReconcileNumericRule(ReconciliationRule):
"""
ReconcileNumericRule
"""
comparison_type: StrictStr = Field(...,alias="comparisonType", description="Available values: Exact, AbsoluteDifference, RelativeDifference.")
tolerance: Optional[Union[StrictFloat, StrictInt]] = Field(default=None, description="For a numeric type only (i.e. decimal, integer, date or datetime offset possibly controversially), this is the quantity used in the comparison. The units of the tolerance must be set appropriately for the item being compared. For a number such as a currency or amount that will be a simple quantity, for a DateTime or DateTimeOffset it should be days. If fewer than a single day then this should be passed as a fraction.")
applies_to: AggregateSpec = Field(alias="appliesTo")
rule_type: StrictStr = Field(...,alias="ruleType", description="Available values: ReconcileNumericRule, ReconcileDateTimeRule, ReconcileStringRule, ReconcileExact.")
additional_properties: Dict[str, Any] = {}
__properties = ["ruleType", "comparisonType", "tolerance", "appliesTo"]
[docs]
@validator('comparison_type')
def comparison_type_validate_enum(cls, value):
"""Validates the enum"""
# Finbourne have removed enum validation on all models, except for this use case:
# Workflow and notification application SDK use the property name 'type' as the discriminator on a number of classes.
# During instantiation, the value of 'type' is checked against the enum values,
# check it's a class that uses the 'type' property as a discriminator
# list of classes can be found by searching for 'actual_instance: Union[' in the generated code
if 'ReconcileNumericRule' not in [
# For notification application classes
'AmazonSqsNotificationType',
'AmazonSqsNotificationTypeResponse',
'AmazonSqsPrincipalAuthNotificationType',
'AmazonSqsPrincipalAuthNotificationTypeResponse',
'AzureServiceBusTypeResponse',
'AzureServiceBusNotificationType',
'EmailNotificationType',
'EmailNotificationTypeResponse',
'SmsNotificationType',
'SmsNotificationTypeResponse',
'WebhookNotificationType',
'WebhookNotificationTypeResponse',
# For workflow application classes
'CreateChildTasksAction',
'RunWorkerAction',
'TriggerParentTaskAction',
'CreateChildTasksActionResponse',
'RunWorkerActionResponse',
'TriggerChildTasksAction',
'TriggerChildTasksActionResponse',
'TriggerParentTaskActionResponse',
'CreateNewTaskActivity',
'UpdateMatchingTasksActivity',
'CreateNewTaskActivityResponse',
'UpdateMatchingTasksActivityResponse',
'Fail',
'GroupReconciliation',
'HealthCheck',
'LuminesceView',
'SchedulerJob',
'Sleep',
'FailResponse',
'GroupReconciliationResponse',
'HealthCheckResponse',
'LuminesceViewResponse',
'SchedulerJobResponse',
'SleepResponse',
'Library',
'LibraryResponse',
'DayRegularity',
'RelativeMonthRegularity',
'SpecificMonthRegularity',
'WeekRegularity',
'YearRegularity',
'LusidEntityDataQualityCheck',
'LusidEntityDataQualityCheckResponse',
'TriggerChildTasksActionResponse']:
return value
# Only validate the 'type' property of the class
if "comparison_type" != "type":
return value
if value not in ['Exact', 'AbsoluteDifference', 'RelativeDifference']:
raise ValueError("must be one of enum values ('Exact', 'AbsoluteDifference', 'RelativeDifference')")
return value
[docs]
@validator('rule_type')
def rule_type_validate_enum(cls, value):
"""Validates the enum"""
# Finbourne have removed enum validation on all models, except for this use case:
# Workflow and notification application SDK use the property name 'type' as the discriminator on a number of classes.
# During instantiation, the value of 'type' is checked against the enum values,
# check it's a class that uses the 'type' property as a discriminator
# list of classes can be found by searching for 'actual_instance: Union[' in the generated code
if 'ReconcileNumericRule' not in [
# For notification application classes
'AmazonSqsNotificationType',
'AmazonSqsNotificationTypeResponse',
'AmazonSqsPrincipalAuthNotificationType',
'AmazonSqsPrincipalAuthNotificationTypeResponse',
'AzureServiceBusTypeResponse',
'AzureServiceBusNotificationType',
'EmailNotificationType',
'EmailNotificationTypeResponse',
'SmsNotificationType',
'SmsNotificationTypeResponse',
'WebhookNotificationType',
'WebhookNotificationTypeResponse',
# For workflow application classes
'CreateChildTasksAction',
'RunWorkerAction',
'TriggerParentTaskAction',
'CreateChildTasksActionResponse',
'RunWorkerActionResponse',
'TriggerChildTasksAction',
'TriggerChildTasksActionResponse',
'TriggerParentTaskActionResponse',
'CreateNewTaskActivity',
'UpdateMatchingTasksActivity',
'CreateNewTaskActivityResponse',
'UpdateMatchingTasksActivityResponse',
'Fail',
'GroupReconciliation',
'HealthCheck',
'LuminesceView',
'SchedulerJob',
'Sleep',
'FailResponse',
'GroupReconciliationResponse',
'HealthCheckResponse',
'LuminesceViewResponse',
'SchedulerJobResponse',
'SleepResponse',
'Library',
'LibraryResponse',
'DayRegularity',
'RelativeMonthRegularity',
'SpecificMonthRegularity',
'WeekRegularity',
'YearRegularity',
'LusidEntityDataQualityCheck',
'LusidEntityDataQualityCheckResponse',
'TriggerChildTasksActionResponse']:
return value
# Only validate the 'type' property of the class
if "rule_type" != "type":
return value
if value not in ['ReconcileNumericRule', 'ReconcileDateTimeRule', 'ReconcileStringRule', 'ReconcileExact']:
raise ValueError("must be one of enum values ('ReconcileNumericRule', 'ReconcileDateTimeRule', 'ReconcileStringRule', 'ReconcileExact')")
return value
[docs]
class Config:
"""Pydantic configuration"""
allow_population_by_field_name = True
validate_assignment = True
def __str__(self):
"""For `print` and `pprint`"""
return pprint.pformat(self.dict(by_alias=False))
def __repr__(self):
"""For `print` and `pprint`"""
return self.to_str()
[docs]
def to_str(self) -> str:
"""Returns the string representation of the model using alias"""
return pprint.pformat(self.dict(by_alias=True))
[docs]
def to_json(self) -> str:
"""Returns the JSON representation of the model using alias"""
return json.dumps(self.to_dict())
[docs]
@classmethod
def from_json(cls, json_str: str) -> ReconcileNumericRule:
"""Create an instance of ReconcileNumericRule from a JSON string"""
return cls.from_dict(json.loads(json_str))
[docs]
def to_dict(self):
"""Returns the dictionary representation of the model using alias"""
_dict = self.dict(by_alias=True,
exclude={
"additional_properties"
},
exclude_none=True)
# override the default output from pydantic by calling `to_dict()` of applies_to
if self.applies_to:
_dict['appliesTo'] = self.applies_to.to_dict()
# puts key-value pairs in additional_properties in the top level
if self.additional_properties is not None:
for _key, _value in self.additional_properties.items():
_dict[_key] = _value
return _dict
[docs]
@classmethod
def from_dict(cls, obj: dict) -> ReconcileNumericRule:
"""Create an instance of ReconcileNumericRule from a dict"""
if obj is None:
return None
if not isinstance(obj, dict):
return ReconcileNumericRule.parse_obj(obj)
_obj = ReconcileNumericRule.parse_obj({
"rule_type": obj.get("ruleType"),
"comparison_type": obj.get("comparisonType"),
"tolerance": obj.get("tolerance"),
"applies_to": AggregateSpec.from_dict(obj.get("appliesTo")) if obj.get("appliesTo") is not None else None
})
# store additional fields in additional_properties
for _key in obj.keys():
if _key not in cls.__properties:
_obj.additional_properties[_key] = obj.get(_key)
return _obj
ReconcileNumericRule.update_forward_refs()